Thursday, March 10, 2016

National Footprint Accounts – Ecological Balance Sheets for 180+ Countries | Global Footprint Network

Global Footprint Network’s National Footprint Accounts provide a comprehensive way to understand the competing demands on our planet’s ecosystems. www.footprintnetwork.org/public.

These accounts help national governments understand and manage their natural resources—to help them make confident policy decisions and create a prosperous, resilient future for their residents.

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

World Wildlife Day 2016: Reporting Progress in Implementing Global Commitments at National Level remains Key



The World Wildlife Day was first marked on March 3, 2015. This day was established by the UN General Assembly and facilitated by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), to celebrate the planet’s extraordinary array of wildlife, as well as to raise awareness around illegal wildlife trade.

It will be celebrated under the theme “The future of wildlife is in our hands’, which reinforces the inextricable link between wildlife, people and sustainable development. It is the responsibility of each generation to safeguard wildlife for the following generation. It also imparts the pressing need for national action to ensure the survival in the wild of both charismatic and lesser known species.

At this inaugural occasion, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon told an audience in Geneva that, “Despite its intrinsic value to sustainable development and human well-being, wildlife is under threat,” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told an audience gathered in Geneva. “The environmental, economic, and social consequences of wildlife crime are profound. Of particular concern are the implications of illicit trafficking for peace and security in a number of countries where organised crime, insurgency, and terrorism are often closely linked.”

Wildlife commerce – legal and prohibited – sits at the nexus of trade, development, and the environment. Indeed, a key negative impact of wildlife trafficking is that it unsustainably strips countries of vital natural resource assets (BioRes, 2014). This extends well beyond terrestrial mega-fauna such as rhinos and elephants to include key trade industries such as fish and timber. A multifaceted approach that includes demand reduction, law enforcement, as well as sustainable use, will be vital to tackling various illegal wildlife trade challenges.

Unfortunately, the media in East Africa is awash with stories related to continued illegal trade in wildlife. For example this month (February 2016) alone, in Tanzania two residents of Kondoa District in Dodoma Region have been sentenced to 20 years in jail or payment of a Tanzania shs 5 million fine each after being arrested with elephant tusks worth Tanzania shs 38million. In Uganda, Police arrested one person for illegal possession of three Grey Crowned Cranes — the country’s national emblem, whose populations are rapidly declining due to loss and degradation of wetlands, while weak laws have exposed the Kenya’s game parks to poaching even as government officials lead global campaigns to end the menace.

This raises serious operational questions: What can tangibly change events at source (communities and wildlife sanctuaries) to reduce demand and scale up sustainable use options especially for the endangered species like elephants, rhinos and others? How far are the mandated institutions willing and able to execute their respective roles in line with global commitments? How effective are they to reach out to the target / public in the destination countries of this trade?

In February 2014, the UK government hosted a high-profile London Conference on the Illegal Wildlife Trade to discuss the challenge posed by illegal wildlife trade. Forty-six heads of states converged on London, duly agreeing to an official declaration designed to showcase political will to tackle this problem. The Conference issued a Declaration that underline the scale and consequences of the illegal trade in wildlife, noting the need to build on the existing international framework for action, and committing themselves to providing the political leadership and practical support needed to take 5 essential actions.

Similarly, in September 2015, the UN Member States adopted Agenda 2030 which among others recognizes wildlife crime as a threat to sustainable development. The new agenda has two Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with an explicit focus on maintaining the integrity of the natural ecosystems which underpin our development and wellbeing. Environmental crimes, both marine and terrestrial, are targeted under these two goals:
  • SDG14: “Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development”. This goal calls for an end to illegal and unreported fishing, and destructive fishing practices.
  •  SDG15: “Protect, restore, and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, and halt biodiversity loss”. This goal has targets aimed at stopping the poaching and trafficking of protected species of flora and fauna.
From commitment to Action: Prudent for all States to report on progress on the London Declaration

From the London Conference Among others, under the sustainable livelihoods and economic development, States committed themselves and called upon the international community to take action, to recognise the negative impact of illegal wildlife trade on sustainable livelihoods and economic development; Increase capacity of local communities to pursue sustainable livelihood opportunities and eradicate poverty; Initiate or strengthen collaborative partnerships among local, regional, national and international development and conservation agencies to enhance support for community led wildlife conservation and to promote retention of benefits by local communities for the conservation and sustainable management of wildlife, including actions to reduce illegal use of fauna and flora; and to work with, and include local communities in, establishing monitoring and law enforcement networks in areas surrounding wildlife.

Given the gravity of this problem, it would be prudent for all the States represented at this global conference to report back on what they have done. For example, the Kasane conference on the illegal wildlife trade, 25 March 2015 was a UK Government self-assessment of progress on commitments in the London declaration.

This is especially important for East Africa and other countries that are faced with the huge challenge of containing illegal wildlife trade and could best handle it through regional and global partnerships. This can only be known if the self-assessment or independent reporting is done to ascertain actions taken, future actions planned, and ways forward. For the London Conference, this needs to be done by April 2016 in order not to further lose momentum, one year afterwards.

Getting Ready: Implementing the SDGs amidst the current wildlife crisis

The SDGs reflect the importance which UN Member States place on addressing the global wildlife crisis across the source, the transit, and the receiving countries. However success of this will on be measured on progress attained based on the final indictors agreed upon.

It is therefore important for UN member states to periodically generate this information for review in order to determine the relevant courses of action

In conclusion, in order the ‘future of wildlife to be in our hands,’ political will in form of regularly tracking progress on implementing global commitments through self – reporting or independent reporting is key.