For example, millions of households still cook using traditional methods such as open fires or charcoal stoves. These methods
pose serious health risks, particularly for women and children, and contribute
to environmental degradation. Clean cooking technologies—like improved
cookstoves, LPG (liquefied petroleum gas), and electric alternatives—offer
safer and more efficient solutions. However, despite their benefits, adoption
remains slow. One important reason is the deep connection between local
culinary practices and how food is traditionally prepared.
So, cooking in East Africa is not just about making
meals—it’s a cultural experience. Foods like ugali in Kenya and
Tanzania, injera in Ethiopia, and matoke in Uganda are deeply
rooted in family and communal traditions. Many of these dishes require specific
cooking techniques, like long boiling, heavy stirring, or grilling over an open
flame, which traditional stoves handle well (Troncoso et al., 2019). One
participant noted that, ‘In my culture, a fireplace is a sign of life in a home’.
While another one reported that in central Uganda, cooking matoke with firewood (and charcoal) provides food with a special aroma
that the one prepared with e-cooking lacks.
But clean stoves often struggle to replicate these
methods. For instance, making chapati or grilling nyama choma
(roasted meat) on an LPG or electric stove may not produce the same flavour or
texture. Taste is a major factor in food preferences, and when clean cooking
changes the way meals taste, families are less likely to make the switch
(Ochieng et al., 2020).
Another challenge is equipment compatibility.
Traditional East African cooking often involves large pots and pans that may
not fit on smaller, modern stoves. In some cases, these stoves are designed for
entirely different types of cooking, which can discourage users from adopting
them (Berkeley Air Monitoring Group, 2018).
Also, social factors play a role. Women are usually responsible for cooking and experience the harmful effects of smoke, but men
often control household finances. This disconnect can delay or prevent
investment in cleaner technologies (WHO, 2022). Additionally, many clean stoves
require changes in cooking routines or training, which can be a barrier if
women are already stretched for time.
In addition, community influence matters too. If
neighbours or relatives have a bad experience with a clean stove—such as
difficulty cooking staple foods—the entire community may be less inclined to
try it. Conversely, when respected community members demonstrate that clean
stoves work well for local dishes, others are more likely to follow (Clean
Cooking Alliance, 2021).
To encourage widespread adoption, clean cooking solutions must be culturally appropriate. That means designing stoves that accommodate local cooking styles and utensils, and involving women in the design and promotion process. Cooking demonstrations, peer-to-peer training, and local champions can also build trust and acceptance.
Therefore, clean cooking is not just a technical
fix—it’s a social and cultural transition. When developers and policymakers
recognise the importance of food traditions and cooking habits, they can create
solutions that meet people where they are. Only then can East Africa move
toward healthier homes and a cleaner environment.
References
- Berkeley
Air Monitoring Group. (2018). Improved Cookstove Field Studies in
Africa.
- Clean
Cooking Alliance. (2021). Understanding Consumer Preferences in Clean
Cooking.
- Ochieng,
C., et al. (2020). Cultural Factors in the Adoption of Clean Cooking in
Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science.
- Troncoso,
K., et al. (2019). Beyond Technology: Influencing Clean Cooking
Adoption through Culture. World Development.
- World
Health Organisation. (2022). Household Air Pollution and Health.
No comments:
Post a Comment