Kimbowa Richard receives a certificate of appreciation from Reverend David K. Ntale (Photo: Ritah, St Matthew) In
January 2022, I accepted a voluntary appointment as Head of Estates,
Development and Planning (EDP) at St Matthew Church of Uganda under Namirembe
Diocese. Four years later (just yesterday), as I handed over the mantle, I found myself
reflecting not just on projects completed or challenges faced, but on what
church leadership truly means in a changing community.
The
Estates, Development and Planning function is one of the operational arms of
the Church of Uganda, stretching from local congregations to parish,
archdeaconry and diocesan levels. It is the engine room for land management,
infrastructure development, and income-generating initiatives. In many ways, it
determines whether a church remains dependent or becomes sustainable.
When I
assumed office, the foundation had already been laid. The congregation had
mobilised resources to construct a Sunday School building — still a work in
progress. Church land had been leased to two tenants operating kiosks that sold
foodstuffs, charcoal and firewood, creating modest but important income
streams. There had also been efforts to address cases of land encroachment
through diocesan channels, though without resolution.
But
beneath those gains were structural challenges.
Part of
the church land had been encroached upon. A football pitch belonging to the
church had effectively been taken over by individuals who used it regularly
without contributing user fees. Processes to resolve land disputes at higher
administrative levels were slow. At the same time, the economic aftershocks of
COVID-19 were still evident. Household incomes had fallen. Weekly church
contributions declined. The pandemic closures that began in March 2020 had
disrupted both spiritual life and practical development engagement, and
rebuilding confidence took time.
Those
early realities forced me to confront an uncomfortable truth: goodwill alone
does not sustain institutions. Systems do.
Lessons in Stewardship and Systems
Churches
depend heavily on member contributions, fundraising drives, and well-wishers.
But financial sustainability is not simply about mobilising money — it is about
managing it transparently and strategically. Members give more confidently when
they see clear outputs, measurable outcomes, and tangible impact.
Over four
years, I learned that finance is important, but ideas are even more powerful.
When people feel included in shaping solutions — through brainstorming,
planning meetings, and shared decision-making — their ownership increases.
Fundraising then becomes a by-product of belief in the vision.
This
experience reshaped my understanding of leadership. Creativity, inclusion, and
resilience matter more than rigid control. Establishing feedback loops —
reporting back to members, refining plans based on community input, documenting
progress — builds trust. It also strengthens institutional memory.
The role
sharpened my skills in inclusive local planning and in synthesising diverse
ideas into coherent development proposals. I came to appreciate that even at
parish level, structured planning, budgeting, and reporting are not luxuries.
They are essentials.
There is
a clear need for continuous capacity building for church leaders serving in
administrative roles. Financial literacy, preparation of departmental work
plans, narrative reporting, and conflict management are critical skills.
Without them, friction between departments grows and development stalls.
Strengthening these capacities — particularly at diocesan level — would
significantly improve outcomes across congregations.
Linking Faith and Community Development
One of
the most important insights from my tenure is that spiritual growth cannot be
separated from inclusive community development.
St
Matthew Church is located in Nsangi ward, a peri-urban area experiencing rapid
demographic and socio-economic change. According to the 2024 national population census,
the ward has 15,971 people across 4,547 households. Approximately 7 percent of
residents rely on unimproved water sources, and a similar proportion depend on
unimproved sanitation facilities. These conditions affect health outcomes,
educational performance, and overall productivity.
For a
church situated in such a community, development is not optional. It is
integral to ministry.
During my
tenure, we strengthened internal income-generating processes by increasing
kiosk utilisation, moved the Sunday School building closer to completion, and
established a fixed asset register for the first time. We also initiated
partnerships with local actors such as the Rotary Club of Maya to construct a public toilet facility — a
small but meaningful intervention in local sanitation.
Yet
challenges remain. Clergy accommodation requires improvement. Departments such
as the Mother’s Union, Father’s Union, Youth Fellowship, Christian Men’s
Fellowship, Christian Women’s Fellowship and others require sustainable
financing models. Land governance issues must be addressed decisively through
proper demarcation, utilisation of idle land, and lawful eviction of
encroachers. Secure land tenure is foundational for long-term development
planning.
Beyond
infrastructure, the church must increasingly engage in livelihood-oriented
programming: water, sanitation and hygiene education; mobile health outreach;
food security initiatives; and local waste management solutions that address
both biodegradable waste and plastics. These interventions complement spiritual
nourishment rather than compete with it.
A Broader Institutional Imperative
My
four-year journey convinced me that local churches must evolve from being
purely contribution-dependent to becoming strategically development-oriented
institutions. That shift requires three things:
First,
institutional discipline — transparent financial systems, documented assets,
structured plans, and measurable targets.
Second,
inclusive ideation — turning congregational ideas into well-designed, bankable
project proposals capable of attracting support from members, partners, and
well-wishers.
Third,
external partnerships — collaborating confidently with government agencies,
local authorities, and non-state actors who share a commitment to community
transformation and the Global Goals.
Churches
should not shy away from partnerships. Faith institutions remain among the most
trusted community structures in Uganda. That trust can be leveraged responsibly
to advance health, education, environmental stewardship, and social cohesion.
Closing Reflections
As I
handed over office yesterday, I did so with quiet satisfaction. We made progress. We
strengthened systems. We learned difficult lessons about governance and
sustainability. But more importantly, I grew — as a planner, as a steward, and
as a believer in the power of organised community action.
Volunteerism
and spirituality intersect in powerful ways. When anchored in accountability
and inclusive vision, they can transform institutions.
My hope
is that future leaders within Estates, Development and Planning — at St Matthew
and across the wider church — will continue building systems that match our
spiritual calling with practical excellence.
Faith
must inspire worship.
But it must also inspire stewardship, structure, and sustainable development